china has not changed its position, neither on ukraine nor on taiwan and yet china is trying to win france can mutual trust be established. again, china has so far refused to criticize russia for its war in ukraine. it remains adamant on the taiwan issue as well. this handshake seemed like a gesture to revive diplomacy. xi jinping received blinken personally, but the ties are so fraught that re establishing stability looks far fetched. meanwhile in germany, chancellor olaf scholz repeated his appeal to china to use its influence establishing stability looks far fetched. meanwhile in germany, chancellor olaf on russia to help end the war, an appeal that was blatantly ignored. so on to the point, we are asking china's global ambitions, can the west keep up? hello and welcome to the point. i'm misha here in berlin asking china's global ambitions, can the west keep up? hello it has been a week of visits us, secretary of state antony blinken visited china while chinese premier li qian made his first foreign trip to germany and france, whether these visits could be called successful to understan

republic of china as, as the legitimate government over china, that they do not recognize taiwan as an independent states. um, but the american say was absolutely essential. is it to that policy on this whole thing is that there must be no a unilateral attempt to change, besides this quote, and particularly not by force. and, and i think the reason why blink handles that we've had this from joe biden also when he to possibly g 20 summit in bali when he has she made she, jim pink, the last time i'm reiterating that position in public. because the, the chinese is saying, well, actually, this is what you will spend simply mean, but your salamis slicing value, providing weapons more and more weapons. the taiwanese and joe biden is also in various comments where there's also be an interpretation about was the despair of the moment thing, or was it a really intentional thing? has on various cases. the last couple of years said that if the chinese were to a tech taiwan, that the united states would definitely come to taiwan to aid that goes beyond official us policy. and whatever he said t

tensions with china? pres. biden: look, china has -- unrelated to the united states. it is not so much that it was shot down but i don't think the leadership knew what it was and what was in it and what was going on. i think it was more embarrassing than intentional. i'm hoping that over the next several months i will be meeting with xi jinping again and talking about the differences we have, but also how we can get along. host: president biden on saturday. this is from reuters, the chinese president haley progress as he meets with secretary blinken during a rare visit to china. the first by a top u.s. diplomat in five years. we want to know, what do you think of the biden policies toward china? you approve or disapprove deco what was on the agenda for the secretary of state visit. reestablishi hh-level diplomacy, talk about close calls with chinese naval ships around taiwan and other places in asia, chinese efforts to establish military bases in asia, africa and the middle east and china's support for ru

both countries, of course, are in a competition with china. india has a border dispute with china and is increasingly concerned about china's and plants in the region. and that's where we can see some progress. the economic power of the west led by the united states. when you look at that, do you see it being diminished now by the rise of china in india, we're seeing in their dealings with russia. if they don't get on board with the us sanctions, it can make these sanctions basically takes less as well. the reality is that sanctions have very rarely actually transformed countries, south africa and the upper tide regime in the 1980s is probably the one example of sanctions being successful. but when you look at our sanctions, policy needs to be north korea or, or around, or even a rock during saddam error. none of them have accomplished the objective of what we want to see of curtailing their weapons programs. in the case of iran or north korea or changing the regime in a rock. so it's very, very difficult for the united states. it's always been difficult to use sanctions to really tra

not every thing about china always says china audits. i think if you look at the resilience chapter, there's a lot of talk on, on technology dependence on innovation on critical minerals on cyber, on supply chains and so on, that are all in one or another way related to china and ball her abilities and dependencies that germany has to address so and, and then there's also the endorsements of the, the risk approach by the european commission, by president or so the funder lines and, and the reference to wider europe. so it's too simple. just simply do control f, china and you know, that's intellectually a little bit, was easy and doesn't reflect the shift on china in the strategy and then drum thinking, but that will be a process. it will be a longer process as all of these. oh, okay, i just, i saw you're shaking your head along to uh well nodding along rather to to some of what you one was saying there. so go ahead and jump in to yes, exactly. what must, let's look at such a big strategy strategy document is also a message to your top us

-- like china. it is in our interest but at the same time, it is not in our interest to provide technology to china that could be used against us and at a time where it is engaged in a buildup of their nuclear programs in a opaque way and using technology for repressive purposes against their people, how is it in our interest to provide those specific technologies to china. and other countries feel the same way. what this is about again, it is not trying to cut off, illuminate, hinder -- eliminate, hinder economic relations. on the contrary, we think they should be strengthened but in a way that looks out for our workers, that looks out for our companies. i heard many concerns about that today but at the same time, we can, we will, and we must take steps necessary to protect our national security. if the shoe were the -- on the other foot, i had no doubt china would say the same thing. >> the last question goes to reporter from cnn -- a reporter from cnn. sen. blinkin: i want to follow up -- >> i wa

you know, i remember, you know, when i first started interested in china and reporting on china was around when china was entering the wto in 2001. and bill clinton, you know, had delivered this famous line when he was trying to argue for china's inclusion in the wto, which was, you know, he said, you know, if china joins the wto, the internet will know will start spreading there. and, you know, and and, you know, trying to control the internet is like trying to nail jell-o to the wall. right. and so, of course, the communist party will never be able to do that. and eventually, you know, ideas about democracy and freedom and the rule values will spread through china. right. and i think a lot of people believe that. i certainly believe that, you know, and i think and i think china was sort of believed it as well. i mean, i think a really afraid of the internet. they obviously censored it pretty heavily. but i think there was a kind of there was a turning point in china probably around sort of 12, 11, 2012 with the when when social media really started to spread in china quite widely. and i

and china.f state speaking just before his trip to beijing. after his lengthy meeting with foreign minister both u.s. and china have described this conversations as candid and constructive. for more details this break-in -- when i say late think, i mean really mean it. seven hours. what they talk about? >> it was much longer than either side expected which is a positive sign under these conditions. we saw the first row take away from meeting which they announce would come to the u.s. at some point in the near future. there are plans for more talks which given the state of u.s. china ties is progress. what we are looking for today? is a meeting -- there is a meeting and room on the schedule for a meeting with xi jinping. blinken secures that, that would be positive. another take away is to resume military talks which i've been suspended since pelosi's visit to taiwan last year -- have been suspended since policies visit to taiwan last year. that might be trickier. overall the vibe seem good so fa

like china. if you don't do that. those the race german carmakers seem to have taken this message to heart dw mercedes, and bmw are selling out more than on 1000000000 euros to get cooperation agreements with chinese partners rolling for battery production and the development of self driving cars and mobility software. germany's auto industry is doubling its investments in china compared to recent years. china is the place to be china is where we are at home, targeted long term strategy and so just whistling in the dark. one of those steps is to make that china operations more tournaments to kind of create subsidiaries that, that are more independent from the rest of the world they produce in china. unfortunately, i know this is going to have an immense impact. um, uh, the german economy, germany's foreign minister on elena bab box isn't pleased when jobs and supply chains lead the country for china. the german government is currently in talks about a new china strategy for german businesses. sho

tax system to privilege trade with china, free trade with china, or how the china trade inspired the transcontinental railroad, or how antebellum slaveholders and their northern allies like buchanan happy to say more about him. how antebellum slaveholders successfully defined free chinese as enslaved people, paving the way for our contemporary immigration that excludes certain people the basis of their national origins. that's something with antebellum origins in, the politics of slavery. so collectively, the book's chapters are an argument for taking the early history of us-china relations seriously as a foundation for present, but also as evidence of how and how global eyes the us was already in the past. and so with that in mind, want to get into the nitty gritty of one of these episodes the rise of the opium in some of its key characters and some of the key documents i use to investigate and tell that story. and befitting a book that is about on the cover of this this story begins in the hold of a ship. this is not literally the hold of the ship. we when the ship congress sailed

china talked about is one china policy.they're not talking about the same thing. >> yes and no. i think that is important to be aware of the knowledge of the people of china. that is something the u.s. does. there is no disagreement here between the two countries. the united states did not however given to chinese demand. this is the big fighting point. lincoln stressed that and mike and also reiterated that the u.s. does not support taiwan's independence. >> both countries have pledged to stabilize their tense relationship. probably chinese companies will provide this. that is also a huge conflict here. it is interesting that blinken did not blame the chinese government in providing reference to the russian army. i am sure we will hear much more about this topic over the next weeks and months. >> as always, thank you. quickly -- the united states is not the only country reaching out to beijing. >> for the first time in our country's history, we have thrown up a national security strategy. it is so big that they will soon g

disputed south china sea. so what message during the drill seemed to badging and the in the pacific will speak to a novelist in manila, the jared read. welcome to d, w and use asia. the you with philippines and japan have begun joint naval drills for the 1st time and the strategically important south china sea. they're being held in waters off the baton province of the philippines and will last a week. they include maritime law enforcement training and search and rescue missions. the nations of boosting how they can walk right to, to, to growing chinese associate this by doing it claims launch maritime regions that overlap the exclusive economic science of all the nations, including the philippines is the us perspective on the drills. the more countries we have better committed to the same ideals of a free and open indo pacific. the ability to enforce your own nation laws and your own nations. what waters your own sovereignty, the stronger we can be as a team, the stronger those ideals are. and for its pod chi

and yet china is trying to win friends can mutual trust, be established again. china has so far, refused to criticize the shelf, or it's water, new trade. it remains adamant on that i want issue as well. this hon shakes being like a just to, to revive diplomacy. she jen thing receive blinking fox movies. but the dies also fraud that re establishing stability looks fall fast, mean bind in germany, johnson to all of charles repeat. it has a fee to china to use its influence on russia to help in the war on a bill that was blatantly ignored. so on to the point, we are asking china global ambitions come to west, keep up the hello and welcome to to the point. i'm you show patios on. i'm here in berlin. it has been a week or visit us secretary of state on to me blinking visited china, was chinese premium. leach young, made his false bought and trip to germany. and from both of these visits could be called successful during this time that after you what the guess with me today we have john scouts now. he's in alta, broad, costa, and has worked with various media houses and also rides for interna

china has 400. there are is a pembroke element to this which is that china's 10 or 15 away from having current worst-case projected amount of forces, so it's not at all clear that we will ever need more than what we have now to deter china and russia, and it seems to me a priority really needs to be keeping russia constrained as we start to have a dialogue and as has been pointed out, our actions will have some influence on how they develop their forces and the rest of the season in the world. >> coming around, i think there are different forms of agreement. there is a different technology we are talking about that are not conducive to counting and verifying and visually expecting, so we have to be open to new ways to address the regrets we have and how to mitigate them. >> thank you. let me ask you, if you have jotted down a question on a pad, could you hold it up a little bit so our team can collect them and funnel them to me. i see at least three or four, so i hope we will get them up rapidly. th

i germany has two trade with china. ~ , . , germany has two trade with china. ~ , ., , , china.nk germany is t in: china. i think germany is trying to _ china. i think germany is trying to do _ china. i think germany is trying to do what - china. i think germany is trying to do what it - china. i think germany is trying to do what it can l china. i think germany is| trying to do what it can do china. i think germany is - trying to do what it can do to enhance the economic relationship while still respecting the important political alliance with the united states of course the crux of this is ukraine, where both germany and the united states support ukraine at pushing back russia and china is on the other side of that with a warm embrace of putin. what challenges will both countries face moving forward economically?— economically? there is a question _ economically? there is a question for _ economically? there is a question for germany . economically? there is a i question for germany about dependency of concentration risk. rememberas dependency of concentration risk. remember a

she looked at me, and she said, "if you make china the enemy, china will be the enemy.owerful foreign ministry echoed key grievances in answer to a question about the trade dispute. rory: many of these points go to the independent policy choices of the australian government in a democratic system, including choices to do with legislation, with the funding of think tanks, with the freedom of the australian media, with diplomatic positions australia takes in the international system. so, it's simply untenable for any australian government to concede on those points. and i fear that, in a way, the chinese government has painted itself into a corner. stephen: in the same month that china effectively banned australian barley, another rural export was hit. female: four australian abattoirs have been banned from selling red meat into china. one of the meatworks is in casino in northern nsw, while three are based in queensland. patrick hutchinson: when we found out it was all hands to the pump exceptionally quickly. i certainly was on the phone for basically 72 hours just becau

china xi jinping.tants, for example, electricity appeared in the village in 1988. thanks to his help. after the locals wrote him a letter, the lazy man last visited in february 2015, already as the general secretary of the chinese communist party and the chairman of the prc, the whole village of the local peasants gathered to meet with him. they are very proud that the current leader of china once lived and worked in the countryside. they see in him a countryman who takes all the people's cares and needs to heart. as i understand it, when he was 15-16 years old. he lived here in landha, communicated and worked with the peasants and knows perfectly well how and with what they live, therefore, after he became the leader of the state. he gives great attention to the life of the peasants. today , the lazyman's village is officially one of china's popular red tourism destinations, according to local authorities. over the past year alone, about a million guests from different regions of china have visited it

like be heavy china office. part of its bureaucratic politics. second is the issue of i want to have a window into china because they are so interested. china can pay for a lot of the advice they want from the world bank group. they don't need to borrow money but the reason is the business model of the world bank as they lend money to rich countries with a good credit rating and then they cross subsidize that by lending to poor countries with a poor credit rating. if china can finance its own development, we should stop this practice and i think they've sort of gotten the memo but the world bank hasn't fully gotten the memo and they will give you world bank answers to this sort of thing. we've got to stop it. >> you highlighted earlier by 2025, china should graduate from the program. twenty, 25 years too late. we can start now. >> i agree. >> with of the time i have remaining i do want to ask you you brought up an interesting proposition including taiwan. it's because the united states is the largest contributor in the bank we should have also a

she famously admitted to having b 90 on china is germany's position on china. china still live well, it depends on who you who you look at. i think germany is undergoing a a reevaluation or reassessment of it's trying to policy. i think it's for many decades . it's thought china is a lucrative market and little else. increasingly it sees china as a challenge, potentially a threat, but not everyone in the government wants to adjust policy as quickly as, as, as others. um, so we'll have to see how it, how things develop. and it has germany picked aside regarding taiwan yet, and indeed a korea policy. so i think germany is uh, trying to uh, reinforce hits for license with taiwan. but being very careful about not doing so and provoking china. we did see the 1st german administered travel to taiwan in a quarter century a few months ago. so germany is, is tip toeing towards a more closer relationship with taiwan. but it's certainly not willing to, to iraq, the voters do anything to provoking in that my, in raids, china, and so provoking china to do want, as well. we've seen a trip to taiwa

china is much more than just a mere competitor. communist china is an enemy. it is the most dangerous foreign threat we faced since the second world war. we have to stop wasting time. that was four years to -- true four years ago when i said as much in seoul and it is more so today. we must respond domestically, economically and militarily. confronting china starts at home. we must systematically eliminate its interference and infiltration of our society. the situation is worse removed -- that most people realize. the communist party has -- abused her openness in extraordinary ways. it uses economic freedom to threaten security and food supplies, our academic freedom to confront our students and scholars and the freedom of sheep -- speech touche -- to spread lies and china treats our homeland like it's a personal playground. that is twice the size of new york city. we are just talking about any old property. china has bought well farms near sensitive military facilities in china has taken a majority control of agricultural industries. this must end. the line b

china. if there's analysts and senior fellow at the tire institute, that's a chinese geopolitical think tank and culture, sir in england, is natasha lynch, that deputy dean and professor at the university of essex. natasha focuses on us policy and foreign affairs and in china is commercial capital. shanghai is joseph mahoney, professor of politics and international relations at east china normal university. a warm welcome to you on thanks so much for joining us today on inside story. joseph, let me start with you today. expectations for this visit by anthony blinking to badging are low, but how significant is it that the visit is happening? and could it actually helped me in the relationship between china in the us? you know, at the end of the g 7, find t's that a saw in china, you escalations might be coming a recent way. security, the temporary genet yelman's offered what some dude has and solely a tory remarks against the coupling. and the importance of, uh, continuing to advance trade be

and china in its place. the same way they did with japan, back in the eighty's for the plaza accord. china is not going to accept that. so there has to be a new day, a new kind of understanding natasha, whatever ends up happening. the fact that this visit is actually going ahead is this, in some way an acknowledgment. however hesitant, it may be that the strategic arrivals that the us and china need one another in order to further their own interest, both at home and abroad. is that essentially the message that we're getting out of all this to? yes, definitely. and as i've, i've already mentioned that their economies are compatible in many ways that they, you know, export and import huge amounts of goods with one another. this is something that has been going on now for, for decades, and it's deeply entrenched and it affects all aspects of the economy and the global economy. so there are a lot of points for cooperation. it's just this issue of growing this trust that has taken place and people can assign bla

china _ is very strict law. on the one hand, china presents - is very strict law. on the one | hand, china presents the idea of national security is of paramount importance is the precondition to any form of economic development. but the reality indeed is that simply businesses are struggling. european businesses in china have come out saying a record number of businesses now believe the economic environment is deteriorating and perhaps the biggest risk ahead is of really a fundamental mismatch between legal systems, where european governments may impose stricter supply chain due diligence and supply chain due diligence and supply chain due diligence and supply chain audit requirements, whereas in china these are supplies —— supply chain audits may be seen as a form of espionage and obviously thatis form of espionage and obviously that is a very risk to companies and it may cause them to diversify or stall future investments. the labor party is calling for further investigation intermittent metropolitan police racist murder of stephen last 30 years ago after the bb

indeed, china is claiming indian kushnir. china is entering into relations with pakistan .s, of course, is a very long-term process. nowadays they do not escalate much, especially against the background of the fact that india is preparing for a large-scale investment in kashmir, and we saw this during the session with 20 when it does not ride at all and would corner events in india or offend india quite strongly, but we understand that india does not entertains itself with illusions around the people's republic of china. and the government in fact is in vogue, it perfectly understands that the people's republic of china is a key threat to india's security at the same time, india is counting on western investments, fc sumir, strengthening indian capabilities. and this is very good news for us, because it will mean india's departure from russia. from the reduction of its indian labor from china and, in general, the return of india to the rails of the democratic world, and immediately after this visit of blinkin , a historic visit of modi to washington is expected, it seems to

and china.il recently one would be forgiven for thinking australia is from the other side of the u.s. strategically. it is australia trying to get to the middle? >> we have an alliance with the united states which has been in place really since the end of the second world war and formerly since the 1950's. it is central to our national security and it is central to our worldview. none of that changes. we are a country of the region in our largest trading partners china. we value a productive relationship with china. we seek to deal with china on its on terms. it is complex, that relationship because they are security anxieties we have in respect of china. we are seeing a significant buildup of its military. that is happening without a sense of strategic reassurance to us but to the region and the world about its purpose. we have our issues. we do have a significant economic relationship with china and we want to manage that as well. ultimately this is the reason why dialogue matters. how you nav

china.bilities can be even nuclear probabilities are always there, unfortunately, if sorry the gun hangs it. unlikely, here but there is a share, but there is, but that's not the problem. we live in a world of truth where probability is nothing speaks. uh, the chinese threat is so hyped in american society, including among democrats and republicans. this is generally general content that china is an enemy, that in any case, when you empty your arsenals and at the same time you shout and say, as it were, that we are there with china, this is our enemy, he writes it down in documents. so we say that we need the armed forces. at the same time , you intimidate the arsenals and nothing happens, and you turn out to be weaker, at least in the ideas of information people in your head, of course, these are big, uh, questions about the population to their politicians. like the democrats , so are the republicans. of course, they will put pressure on them, but still democracy, still america is inside, n

of china, the foreign policy of china, — of china, the foreign policy of china, the _ of china, thento the — china, the expansion of china into the south china seas and the indo—pacific into the indian _ the indo—pacific into the indian ocean, it's more and more — indian ocean, it's more and more of— indian ocean, it's more and more of a _ indian ocean, it's more and more of a threat notjust indian ocean, it's more and more of a threat not just to us but to— more of a threat not just to us but to world prosperity, to peace, _ but to world prosperity, to peace, to free trade. and you're _ peace, to free trade. and you're going to see india is not — you're going to see india is notjust— you're going to see india is notjust a _ you're going to see india is notjust a bilateral relationship or partnership for the us, — relationship or partnership for the us, the biden strategy is to work— the us, the biden strategy is to work more effectively with japan, — to work more effectively with japan, south korea, with the philippines, indonesia. this is a multipronged, multi—year strategy— a mul

and china and europe and china, could we expect trade deals or is that a long way off? bruce: i think we are still quite a ways off. the chinese have been hoping to have some sort of trade deal with the europeans. we know trade deals take years and years to negotiate. that would not be of much solace for people looking for a short-term boost to the chinese economy. goldman sachs among others have downgraded its forecast for chinese economic growth. china is still struggling as it tries to emerge from its post-covid zero isolation. francine: thank you, both for joining us on this nice round up on this monday morning. mark cudmore and bruce einhorn. you're getting breaking news. sartorius was -- shares dropping 14% after it cut its forecast. one of the big plunges we are seeing as they are not only cutting their forecast but worry about what is coming up ahead. ubs executive ermotti speaks of a culture change at the lender. that is coming up next. this is bloomberg. ♪ but by the third or fourth cup, your stomach might not feel so good. if that sounds like you replace your

. china. they came to german auto industries, most important market accounting for some 40 percent of its total turn over. no other international car producing country is as dependent on the chinese market as germany. it all began with a v. w santana. in 1983 volkswagen set up a joint venture in shanghai and to build the sedan, especially for the chinese market. as, as volkswagen, we've also contributed to the quality level of our competitors there. with the technology work and outstanding autos we produce for customers. we've left our mark on the market there. let's see though, we've certainly help bring about technological progress in the respective regions to have by the fuse you guys on a n s, and they helped china learn from scratch and improve the automotive industry. i teach him a tracy. yes. so the credit for the last 20 years there to years german car companies have been excellent teachers and set an example for the whole chinese auto industry, how the law. so how about young? for dec

you said germany got in so deep with china, in the last decade in the hospital. so the 2 sides built an incredibly close, almost symbiotic relationship. now the cracks of showing, showing that became germany's top trading pond for years in a row. but the pen demik showed that supply chains could break down and a crisis german car companies became addicted to china is exploding market. now, chinese rivals are threatening to beat them and electric cause chinese tech got stuck into sensitive gem and infrastructure. now that seen as a security risk, one of this present spelling with some really tough di lemme is about how to rethink the relationship with china. and inside the government here, there are different views. here's a case in point. china is state and shipping john costco, both to stay can a terminal in the handbook hub, germany's most important port, a foreign minister and the babel concise chancellor robot. how big, what adamantly against saying this would give china too much sway of a critical infrastructure. but while i've sold over volt them is chancel

where is my present teaching paint and china is 12 diplomatic one, the china is following. the assessing zine is in guy and he's being outlined with some of the subjects that they've covered. and there were quite was quite a significant list of them, including on russia and north korea. taiwan, of course, human rights violations are allegations, essentially with regard to china. he also discussed us citizens being housed by china, but also food security. synthetic o, p. o is on fence now. it's a very wide uh the list of thoughts i want to go to katrina. you who's dining by for us and by using the overall sense, katrina, tell me what you think is that this was 2 sides essentially re stating where they stand on on specific issues. nevertheless, attempting to find the some sort of common ground. and one gets a sense, but that is what has actually been achieved from this. what do you think the i think that's right. i mean, lincoln seems to be very clear on each side. and especially in the last part of his press conference saying that progress is hard that things are going to ta

as i've been speaking to at china, around the list of clifford coon and i asked him why china has said such a big draw to next sports. while i think it's basically all down to week global demand, that's the sort of the headline reason. it was indeed a big decline, much worse than anyone have been expecting. even the more bullish people on the chinese economy hadn't expected the decline to be so strong. i mean, i think the european european export some from the to the you found nearly 39 percent, which is a staggering amount. and basically what you've seen is sort of the 1st of all, there's a normalization a year ago. we were coming as we were coming out of the pond. demik shanghai had just reopened and we saw in the impact of that. whereas other markets were still close to a feeling depend demik. so in some ways it's not as bad as it looks. but overall, the problem, the child is dealing with is this week global demands, which means there just isn't the demand for the ex 4th. and that's, that's ultimately the challenges facing china right now. is there something that facing would have b

pressure on china.here are serious civilizational cultural pressures. uh, china, look how just shanfu, well, the minister, uh, china's defense will still be in singapore on the form shangrila, how they u literally met the us secretary of defense uh in the corridor, said hello and parted and did not communicate anymore. this is a very important point. that is , there is no dialogue on defense issues. and i think that here what to understand, uh, china will not be a simple partner for us, which will simply supply what we want, we must definitely look for those options that are interesting to china, the main mistake that many of our companies make. even the big ones are trying to offer themselves to china without realizing that china has your interest and need to see. what can china do? here we need to change the interaction strategy a bit. and if we change, then, of course, we must understand that china does not need russia. and these are all myths that i am in the first place, and china understands this,

is it a china that has no voice? a china that has no, i'm vision in a china that essentially serves as a, an industrial park for the united states. yeah, i think um, well 1st of all, you know, quite a few years ago the time when china was successful. the then the big hill, there was the expectation that china with the, according to a contractually that washington desires off that. so it's, and it didn't happen. i mean, i think that represents the sort of a arrogance and, and hubristic a opinion on this side that is only one good model of develop them. and that's the only good model of development trying to doesn't go into that direction. so that disappointed. now, back to the old question about, you know, the distinction between limited or no voice. and i think, you know, from that perspective, poverty does do it. i don't think they expect china has no voice. i mean, come, i is just as impossible. i think the, what a desire is that china has a contain, establishes some kind of a knowledge of a nato allies in, in the

many china.the semiconductor issue, 90% of advanced semiconduct orers made in taiwan. when and if the ccp goes into taiwan, that will enable them to turn the world on and off, isn't that right? >> that's right. and control about 40% of global container shipping and 90% of the largest shipping that flows in and around taiwan will be right under beijing's thumb. you would have thought we would have learned our lesson when they cut i off ppe, personal protective equipment, when they threatened to send us into the sea of despair by cutting off our pharmaceuticals -- maria: right. >> they sill have that capability. we want it to get back to the united states, but if we can't, how about allies like india? i give kevin mccarthy a lot of credit, we're going to have a joint address from modi in congress this week. it's a race against time, maria. maria: very important point that you make. president trump knew this adversary real well. he had xi jinping at mar-a-lago as a guest the second leader that he ho

what i, china is all these china, china, white china. it's because china is growing rapidly and is providing us with opportunities. yeah. no, i knew you were very clear that and um, actually i wanted to get on to that fake uh, hoax, news from, from ginger yang that we covered here on going underground as nature nation media was reading that propaganda or about circle genocide in as in jack but either your screen stopping occasionally, i don't know whether that's the sanctions on huawei technology. you know, there's a battle going on. uh, frankly, i mean, uh, what's the significance of a m b s meeting with the blinking, blinking go straight there.

it was called the russia-china partnership looking to the future. and the author of this article was none other than russian president vladimir putin, and today i would just like to talk about the future. it seems to me that it would be interesting for everyone, because we often hear reports about how well we are doing. how trade is growing, but i would like to talk about plans, and about ideas about new directions for the development of our relations, because, well, here we have a lot of new things at the china and modern asia institute. we are for this year have become the largest state analytical center for the study of modern china, but i am sure that our other speakers also have a lot of news, many new ideas for new projects, so, of course, we are waiting for them to tell us about them mr. joulin, representative of the chinese union entrepreneurs in russia to whom i would like to give the floor, dear friends. hello i am very glad that we have the opportunity to meet again in st. petersburg , we most importantly, what do we understand? in which

of china. and this was, this was a, you know, really out of step with what some of the other things that we were seeing and hearing from your actual king here. of course he was one of the 1st to, to sort of break ranks. but again, what i'm, what i'm hearing from a lot of, or uh you're getting colleagues, is that in fact, there is no real difference among european types of states. they are pretty much lock step with, with united states at this point. and even because they're, they're not sure how to implement things like chips they're, they're being even more robust in terms of how they're doing it. and then you know, i, i have a cc i, i suspect that if, if we can see china making significant headway on the piece proposal that they put forward with ukraine. and i think that a presentation is going to honor his relationship with the sheet and thing and, and help that along that we might see a present boot and inter so feeling something that he's teased in the past, which is negotiating or mediati

india in its competition with china, which would help in this competition with china , besides, it is to cooperate with states on an equal level , that is, on raider mode , today leads india to the status of one of global leaders to the status of one of the centers of world powers, the eu is trying to promote the idea of ​​reform for the sake of un security, so that india takes the place of one of the permanent members of the security council, and to this day, as we can see from the agreements that will be reached in washington, india receives investments from the united states of america , india continues to develop cooperation in the ucc in space, for example, some productions will be located in the united states, but located on the territory of india, this is normal to be a positive influence on the development of the indian economy. i generally like hrytsenko, the chief consultant of the national institute of strategic studies was in direct contact with us. we have important information . before active actions , we all had a unique chance to determine our fate and destiny

itself are developed in china.n the same place, china is trying to present itself as a very promising strategic partner for german. well, or european business as a whole, but trade with europe is growing optimistic about europe. interest in europe is now extremely high among chinese people , but the question is always the same. , it makes sense to agree with europe. and if europe fulfills all the wishes of the united states , then these agreements have no great prospects; they still hope, after all , for the first. yes, they are serious. they are very they want to find this core of european strategic autonomy in order to build long-term partnership and science in the economy, investments and other areas by turning to it. and the us well, some kind of complicated situation. well, blinken has arrived. eh, that's a good decision. let's resume cultural, scientific and educational contacts. well , firstly, the americans, with their restrictive measures of the chinese, simply scared away the number of flights during the

and of course they also export from, from china. so to, so they built a certain type of car there and export it. i'm having said that it seems to be that companies themselves, the large companies themselves don't necessarily see it as a very risky market at the moment we had a couple of weeks ago in germany, statements by ceo's of large companies saying that they are committed to the chinese market, it'd be as f, the, the company called multinational how's, of course so, so announced a large investments in china to build new facilities. so even though they, they, the risk is obviously there if something does go wrong, it seems that the, certainly the ceo's of the large companies don't really risk, don't really value that risk or the company, the estimate that risk is being very high at the moment. what about this current german government, a coalition government? is it making it clear enough to those businesses what the potential risk is? so that's a good question i, i think these companies are very well aware of the risk. i'm not e